Protocol of 22 January on the new model contract will result in a simplification of procedures. He said the president of 'Aran, Massimo Massella Ducci Teri on the sidelines of the hearing in the House Labor Committee sull'assetto industrial relations and the prospects for reform of collective bargaining.
"I explained - said Ducci Teri - profiles of positivity that can from the application of the Protocol of 22 January to public and private sectors in terms of simplification and reduction procedures, in particular through the introduction in the three-year renewals, which replaces the double bargaining every two years. "
During the hearing, he added," I have shown that in this protocol is repeated and confirmed the prediction of a single model contract for public and private sector . Among the positive points, recalled the president dell'Aran, "the enhancement of second-level bargaining with its destination at the result and merit."
As for the possibility that the CGIL could fall into the discussion, Ducci Teri noted that by the former Labour Minister Cesare Damiano, it was hoped "that in the implementation phase of the CGIL can participate."
Among those opposed to the Protocol of 22 January, signed by CISL, UIL and UGL, with several independent trade unions, there are also the base unions, in particular complain that SDL was not even consulted.
In a leaflet distributed at this time, the states that the national contract, with the new rules, will not guarantee the recovery of actual inflation and never even to those recorded by ISTAT: for inflation as a reference will be based on a "predictive index" completely theoretical and does not take into account the increased prices of oil, gas and petrol.
SDL hailed as 'good news' of the CGIL choice not to sign the text. Hard, however, Feedback for the CISL, UIL and UGL, "which now passively accept the role of a limited review by a co-worker the other side '. The male and female workers must have the last word on the agreements, claiming the union's base.
and there are also distinguishes itself from the CGIL, guilty of "having prepared the ground for this latest failure, signing contracts and agreements, national and local authorities, who have certain protected rights and wages of civil servants and private."
0 comments:
Post a Comment